1046| 16
|
[硬盘/SSD] msata好像比普通sata速度慢不少啊|自动提醒阅读字号:
|
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
| |
签名被屏蔽
|
|
| ||
| ||
X200 P8600(3.15G) 4G 128SSD WIN7 64
|
||
| ||
X230FHD(13.3 1920*1080) coreboot i7-3615QE 8G*2 三星1T+512G SSD
|
||
| ||
X61, X62, X200, X201, X240, T450S, T570, T580,,,....
|
||
| ||
L670/NV160WUM-NH0+SN520+1100+HK4R X330/P130ZFZ-BH2+S3610+LMT-19nmBGA X210s(3001)/HV121WX6-110+SM951a+SM841+840pro X200/HV121WX5-120+S3710
used-X301:SU9800/SU9900/SP9600,X201:i7-620M,X201s:i7-640LM,X201T:i7-620LM,X220:i7-2640M,X230:i5-3210M/i5-3320M,X330:i5-3320M,T430s:i7-3520M,X1C:i7-3667U |
||
点评
回复@wj321 : 是的 X230还不改走线纯粹就是懒
回复@ivex : K29设计和X220不同,X220的走线导致Sata3.0不稳定,后来各个方案引出Msata都出现卡顿现象,联想保守设计没错。只不过X230还这样做就不可理解了
回复@wj321 : 关键是同代的K29另一个3.0就是给msata了。就因为有个底座,就把3.0给底座导致msata只有2.0纯粹是制杖设计
回复@ivex : 而且X220当年那个插槽主流是3G,出厂带Msata的机型似乎都没有
回复@ivex : 当年Msata还没有取代Sata固态成为主流
原来如此那是我记错了。这就更离谱了,本身有一个2.5是3.0的了,光驱位硬盘方便拆卸多半是机械硬盘,却把本来应该给msata的3.0给抢走了,这tm太离谱
| ||
| ||
| ||
💻 MacBook Pro 14.2': M1 Pro 10+16, 16G, 1T | TP T62 15'UXGA LED: T9300, NVS140M, 8G, 512G EnterpriseSSD
💻 TP T400 WXGA+ LED: X9100, HD3470, 8G, 960GB EnterpriseSSD | TP W500 WSXGA+ CCFL: E8435, V5700, 8G, 120G SSD 💻 TP T500 WXGA LED: T9600, 4500MHD, 3G, 500GB HDD | TP T61p 15.4'WSXGA+ CCFL: T9500, FX570M, 8G, 240G SSD |
||
| ||
💻 MacBook Pro 14.2': M1 Pro 10+16, 16G, 1T | TP T62 15'UXGA LED: T9300, NVS140M, 8G, 512G EnterpriseSSD
💻 TP T400 WXGA+ LED: X9100, HD3470, 8G, 960GB EnterpriseSSD | TP W500 WSXGA+ CCFL: E8435, V5700, 8G, 120G SSD 💻 TP T500 WXGA LED: T9600, 4500MHD, 3G, 500GB HDD | TP T61p 15.4'WSXGA+ CCFL: T9500, FX570M, 8G, 240G SSD |
||
| ||
MacBook Air 联想拯救者R7000
IBMT43P ThinkPadT400 T410i X230 W530 |
||
Powered by Discuz! X3.5 © 2001-2023 Comsenz Inc
GMT+8, 2025-1-10 16:05 , Processed in 0.152041 second(s), 45 queries , Gzip On, OPcache On.